Thursday, May 5, 2011

Of Course, Fire Him. Duh. #losing

And not because I don't like the Angry Hockey Teletubby. I do love him. He's a good hockey coach. He's feisty. He's funny. He's foul mouthed.

But at some point, the burden of proof shifts from the premise: "Why should he be fired" to "why should he stay".

When you have four straight years in which a 1, 1, 2, and 3 seeded team fails to make it past the second round, then that's a real trend.

You fire Coach Boudreau because the downside is almost non-existent. GM George McPhee has done an excellent job - in my opinion - of assembling a very talented, young team. As such, a ham sandwich dressed up in Don Cherry's loud suits and french cuffed shirts could coach this roster into the playoffs.

And there's really no difference between being a 1, 4 or even 8 seed.

If you bring Coach B back, then there's enormous pressure and nervousness around this time next spring. The feeling will be "this CANNOT happen again!" That's no way to enter the playoffs. A new coach - or the ham sandwich - brings a clean slate.

The Caps job, if open, instantly becomes the best job in the league. You'll have your pick of guys. The time is now. Sorry, Bruce. But thanks for all that you've done.

As they say, it's just business.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Meanwhile, if you missed this on my Twitter feed (@czabe) then here's a little snarky gem from fellow bitter Caps fan Mike Lewis.




>>>>>>>>>>>>


The Toronto Sun has a 8 Reasons the Caps Crapped Out piece. The man clearly under the spotlight, is Canada's whipping boy, the Russian superstar Alex Ovetchkin. I used to think Candian favoritism of Sid The Kid was a bit jingoistic, but it is gaining more merit with each early flameout.
The captain did manage 10 points in nine playoff games, but there are serious questions about his leadership ability. 
Yes, he is one of the greatest players in the NHL, capable of tilting a game in his team's favour on a whim. But Ovechkin doesn't seem to make the players around him better as so many of hockey's great leaders do. 
"We were hungry, we just did not win," Ovechkin said after Game 4. "We want to win, they want to win but somebody has to lose." 
Somebody has to lose? Hard to imagine Jonathan Toews or Sidney Crosby taking a gutting loss with such a shrug of the shoulders. Until Ovechkin makes more of an impact than the occasional big hit or flashy goal, his reputation will be lacking.
Good points, except you can't take too much from the "somebody has to lose quote" because Ovie has done wonders to learn to speak English, and those subtle nuances get lost in translation. I'd cut him slack on that. Only longtime North American, English speaking athletes understand that such a statement of fact, plays poorly.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Finally, Caps uber-fan "Let's Go Caps" Lloyd, offers this, the day afterward.

Hello Steve, This is lets go caps Lloyd. First off, please tell Andy that I was right when I told him and Redline bar last Thursday that I was nervous about this series. I didn't like the matchup. Andy of courses laughed and disagreed with me. Now on to venting.

As a Caps fan that started going to games for free because my grandfather was best friends with former Caps GM Max Mcnabb, I have seen my share of heartbreaks. It started in the 80's with a few mild surprises mixed in (see hunters game 7 overtime goal against the flyers or langways OT series clincher vs Rangers) and then the 90's came along where every year it seems like the Pens got the best of us. So these last 4 years, I have always had low expectations, and the Caps have seem to fulfill those low expectations. Maybe we are cursed? So what should we do?

I agree with you. Bruce Boudreau is a nice guy, has done wonders for helping turn around not only this franchise, but also Hadeed carpet cleaners. Heck, he even makes me want to own a Mercedes if I had the money. But I think a change is needed. Some times you need to make a change for the sake of change. I think Mcphee needs to go after a coach that has won a cup i.e. Bob Hartley, Mark Crawford or even Mike Keenen (yes that Mike Keenen). The locker room seems to comfortable, and that's the problem. I keep thinking to the U.S. Hockey team of 1980. What did Herb Brooks try to accomplish. He wanted the team to become one and the way he did that was to have the team have a singular enemy early on, himself.

I also think a shakeup of the roster is needed. Mike Green and Alex Semin probably would be the best trade bait. You are not winning anything with them. Goaltending is fine. Mark my words, if and when the Caps do win big, it will be Braden Holtby in goal.

Again, thanks for letting me vent and playing armchair GM. The show is great. And my Sundays will soon be free for some golf. And please make sure you tell Andy I told you so!

J.R. Herrin

AKA Lets go Caps Lloyd.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Craction is coming

As an incentive for being notified about when the 2011 Craction registration for NFL and College Leagues opens, we are giving away a 50'' LCD HDTV. Simply enter your email address at our site http://www.craction.com/ - the sign up process takes less than a minute.

This year Craction has chosen a new web development company and we will be providing leagues for the NFL, College Football & Basketball, NBA, College Bowl Season, 4th Quarter Blitz, NCAA Tournament and 2012 MLB seasons! We've also added new features like forums, polls, as well as audio and video clips related to sports and Craction.

SPREAD THE WORD, YOUR SUPPORT IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!

It's The Stadiums, Stupid

 What is the NFL lockout really all about? It's not the trite and over-used "billionaires vs. millionaires" analogy.
What is the NFL lockout really all about? It's not the trite and over-used "billionaires vs. millionaires" analogy.

It's about stadiums. Period.

Taxpayer supported stadiums, and the desire for at least 2 or 3 more of them to be built as soon as possible.

Here's a good piece by Evan Weiner about the "out of whack" world of sports, and in particular the "stadium shakedown" scheme that is going on in the NBA and NHL right now too.

Writes Weiner....

NFL owners have done a poor job of explaining the why behind their proposal of asking the players to take substantially less of the gross, from about 59 percent to 41 percent with 48 percent of that going to player salaries. The players don’t believe there is a real financial problem in the NFL after the league got new large TV deals and a bunch of new stadiums with more revenue streams coming online..The 1986 federal tax code update created the NFL labor dispute. Owners seized on a piece of the changes in the code that had major consequences.

Municipalities could build new stadiums for teams and get as little as eight cents back on every dollar generated inside the facility. Depending on the deal an owner cut with the city officials, an owner could garner as much as 92 cents of every dollar..But it is those taxpayer-funded new stadiums that have caused the problem. With every new stadium that has opened or has been renovated, more revenue does flow into the league — which raises not only the salary cap ceiling but also hikes the salary cap floor..

The 1986 tax code revision was a double-edged sword. For some owners (like Art Modell) it was a lifesaver, while for others (like those in Minnesota), it has been a disaster..Franchises playing in old facilities like the Oakland Raiders, the San Diego Chargers, the San Francisco 49ers, the Atlanta Falcons, the St. Louis Rams, the Minnesota Vikings and others cannot keep pace and are struggling to meet the salary cap floor. Additionally some owners have thrown a lot of money into new stadiums and have to pay down the stadium debt..The 49ers owners, the York family, have not gone full throttle in getting financing for a proposed stadium in Santa Clara as of yet. The league wanted to show the players they need to contribute money for the Santa Clara facility.

REACT: The stadium dynamic that drives league-wide profits, and in particular, owner specific profits, is really the ballgame. Teams that don't have new, modern, ATM-like stadiums built (at least partially) on the public dime, are fighting like hell to get them, or threatening to leave (often unconvincingly).

Other owners who bit the bullet and built Taj Mahal's on heavy doses of private debt (read: their own money) are desperate to steal back as much cash from the players as possible in this fight. They simply can't afford to "lose" this time around, so you understand why guys like Jerry Jones comes swaggering in banging his fists together and threatening to "show you" how serious the owners are.